{"schemaVersion":1,"updatedAt":"2026-10-11T13:25:48.000Z","sources":[{"id":"cre-docs","title":"CRE documentation","url":"https://docs.chain.link/cre"},{"id":"reserve-design","title":"Chainlink Reserve design","url":"https://chain.link/blog/chainlink-reserve-strategic-link-reserve"},{"id":"erc20","title":"ERC-20 token standard","url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-20"},{"id":"holders","title":"Blockscout LINK holders","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?tab=holders"},{"id":"gho-pool","title":"Attributed Ethereum GHO pool transfers","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/address/0x06179f7c1be40863405f374e7f5f8806c728660a?tab=token_transfers"},{"id":"cre-pr","title":"Core node PR 23727","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/pull/23727"},{"id":"cre-removal-pr","title":"Core node PR 23728","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/pull/23728"},{"id":"gho-example","title":"Observed successful source-side CCIP transaction","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0xc5a5ee89a84a8a454ebe542a7a04e49e5c5370a92876163934f49e6bbd4f6c49"},{"id":"node-v264","title":"Core node v2.64.0 release","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/releases/tag/v2.64.0"},{"id":"cre-v264-ancestry","title":"CRE merge versus v2.64.0 ancestry","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/compare/eddf5109401b34c0d3bb62c61ae5bc7a705af49a...v2.64.0"},{"id":"automation-sunset","title":"Automation sunset and migration notice","url":"https://docs.chain.link/chainlink-automation"},{"id":"cre-connector-v264-ancestry","title":"Connector cleanup merge compared with v2.64.0","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/compare/39de8244b2b7aa3ff49b56f642253e5c8b3c3347...v2.64.0"},{"id":"gho-launch-arbitrum-proposal","title":"Aave Arbitrum Remote GSM launch proposal","url":"https://github.com/aave-dao/aave-proposals-v3/blob/881dc2ae3ff949b015b749d6b77ed2b22faf0ab5/src/20260512_Multi_RemoteGSMLaunchArbitrum/RemoteGSMLaunchArbitrum.md"},{"id":"gho-launch-arbitrum-tx","title":"Ethereum mint and bridge transaction","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x43a980f31ee053ed5e9224244293896a28e8bb6434262fb901ba8e7f1eb43ac6"},{"id":"gho-launch-arbitrum-message","title":"CCIP delivery to Arbitrum","url":"https://ccip.chain.link/msg/0xcf28b9383b4db582c5cadcad086dc6a4f5fb254764c4e73d58ba3bd7f75fd605"},{"id":"gho-launch-monad-proposal","title":"Aave Monad Remote GSM launch proposal","url":"https://github.com/aave-dao/aave-proposals-v3/blob/881dc2ae3ff949b015b749d6b77ed2b22faf0ab5/src/20260701_Multi_RemoteGSMLaunchMonad/RemoteGSMLaunchMonad.md"},{"id":"gho-launch-monad-tx","title":"Ethereum mint and bridge transaction","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x54cc456c9c7909bfe342a2b6ef4a3c924f439b131f3d92da0d1181a527e838d3"},{"id":"gho-launch-monad-message","title":"CCIP delivery to Monad","url":"https://ccip.chain.link/msg/0x4005acc7127f868ce6655ac17156fc9ea7ecd7709ec04751ac1e3748af659b04"},{"id":"cosmos-removal-pr","title":"Core-node Cosmos support removal proposal","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/pull/23734"},{"id":"wallet-sequence-incoming","title":"Tracked wallet 100,000 LINK transfer","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x3c66093120f0c4e18af3766cec55d4412be6e0f8da0e7c01e9e8157e7b68620e"},{"id":"wallet-sequence-recipient","title":"Indexed recipient LINK transfers","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/api/v2/addresses/0x020e3cb2db423994eb70156bb87299f68b7ef11f/token-transfers?type=ERC-20&token=0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca"},{"id":"cosmos-v264-ancestry","title":"Cosmos merge versus v2.64.0 ancestry","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/compare/fa897c3d55f584de6ece6255c061b8ef6904d0d5...v2.64.0"},{"id":"wallet-return-20260917","title":"Recipient transfer to original funding address","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x54928c078c51faf98147633dff186b94e846927832a55ed457931087bf61dc0e"},{"id":"wallet-return-580d17be","title":"Verified transfer to original funding address","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x580d17be4cd29eadbadd04b90b225dc2e06142bceb37deefc604285492af3b57"},{"id":"wallet-return-7dd84f82","title":"Verified transfer to original funding address","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x7dd84f82a81184b7c7547f809f5ab178f78a6642921c348a9bc25d394dc7d2b5"},{"id":"wallet-return-c8838b7e","title":"Verified transfer to original funding address","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0xc8838b7e2730a8bbc4a9bfe89558d82225c041da67792681aeadc7ecc41e149f"},{"id":"wallet-return-678f5e5c","title":"Verified transfer to original funding address","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x678f5e5c294ef0db0edf2a5f37d481913ce4e81f0258ca0c22cac4003e6ad377"},{"id":"wallet-return-978259d5","title":"Verified transfer to original funding address","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x978259d5227a7362655b483e81af1a2383a57a7384e2c6a382c678b648e845fc"},{"id":"wallet-return-af6b869d","title":"Verified transfer to original funding address","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0xaf6b869d985adddac21cced1ebe16d05803574d539f7c021df67225dfb715bc5"},{"id":"wallet-return-f3a906ee","title":"Verified transfer to original funding address","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0xf3a906ee57984c23aeebc39fecef6699a327e64e00f71cc7af96f897f121c7b7"},{"id":"wallet-return-5fb65724","title":"Verified transfer to original funding address","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x5fb65724f21fac408eeca3e8d5692d294d643396f195478dbc0ce9c03b0e4da6"},{"id":"wallet-return-280d46d5","title":"Verified transfer to original funding address","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x280d46d50b86eb95b0670d27ba0879ce1d3fc4e9e55aa89df6599c6054f1dd98"},{"id":"wallet-return-eb0e3e7e","title":"Verified transfer to original funding address","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0xeb0e3e7e98b5c1dfb428c65f73fbd3ad450d0cc3adeb35e9e173874740682ec5"},{"id":"triggerCoordinator-draft","title":"CRE proposes separating event handling from execution","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/0a025aea520a2e12d602f5534df0852f09aa9f82/core/services/workflows/syncer/v2/trigger_coordinator.go"},{"id":"subscriptionCache-draft","title":"CRE proposes reusing workflow setup on restart","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/47be7ecbae49e14f170e2074604b24c06965c448/core/services/workflows/v2/engine.go"},{"id":"subscriptionCache-config-20260919","title":"CRE caching proposal: disabled-by-default node setting","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/79e056b1f7999a0e518465cc8e271b30122eeffd/core/config/docs/core.toml"},{"id":"subscriptionCache-engine-20260919","title":"CRE cached subscription reuse at the reviewed revision","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/79e056b1f7999a0e518465cc8e271b30122eeffd/core/services/workflows/v2/engine.go"},{"id":"subscriptionCache-status-20260921","title":"CRE subscription-cache proposal status","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/pull/23774"},{"id":"wallet-repeat-20260920-0","title":"Second funding transaction","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x343a7f02539216c82f8eef85c791e05ac4c560bf25e0180faa43e8db9b3c2bb4"},{"id":"wallet-repeat-20260920-1","title":"Second-round recipient transfer","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0xe5239fc34703ff1645c0e8e6a24b724edc7b94c0ecec53b9324a90a25aa7b21b"},{"id":"wallet-repeat-20260920-2","title":"Second-round recipient transfer","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0xe329526eb4c6a2f46520e0e67823a46641edbe8d4cefcb6b0bb1d50a0dfe2209"},{"id":"wallet-repeat-20260920-3","title":"Second-round recipient transfer","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x30f05b4b35b1bed8aa539158b5c99f56f7ed58c6b9160f50af0522a175643530"},{"id":"wallet-repeat-20260920-4","title":"Second-round recipient transfer","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0xe1259e3745fe7ca075109948ebfa3a727445873f443c367550c7db8e5695d660"},{"id":"wallet-repeat-20260920-5","title":"Second-round recipient transfer","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x27ab22eade2b6be5d2412ee4225c007ddd533c6d6836794d4bcb6373de5fa0da"},{"id":"wallet-repeat-20260920-6","title":"Second-round recipient transfer","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x7a4eac59c8dad8171a76aab2470459159e1b954795616c11374df1b84fb4ab0a"},{"id":"wallet-repeat-20260920-7","title":"Second-round recipient transfer","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0xb99a9c2a9bd068537773703afa454234f4d61dc93fbec2110e6cffb5582a274d"},{"id":"wallet-repeat-20260920-8","title":"Second-round recipient transfer","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x819d9d0b01ee8ffac1a9d7827ca42de1206be67cc4f791bb4618df92769466a7"},{"id":"wallet-repeat-20260920-9","title":"Second-round recipient transfer","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0xfe95234185f7c22127834d506a6cfb6f298637c306f33ce4211f17aa81364d72"},{"id":"svr-q2-report","title":"Chainlink Q2 2026 reported SVR proceeds","url":"https://chain.link/blog/quarterly-review-q2-2026"},{"id":"svr-llamarisk-dashboard","title":"LlamaRisk Aave SVR dashboard","url":"https://dashboard.llamarisk.com/protocols/aave/svr"},{"id":"svr-financial-api","title":"LlamaRisk SVR financial summary","url":"https://dashboard.llamarisk.com/api/svr/aave_v3/financial?window=all"},{"id":"svr-lpf-proposal","title":"LlamaRisk proposal to raise Aave liquidation protocol fees","url":"https://governance.aave.com/t/arfc-liquidation-protocol-fee-increase-for-wbtc-weth-and-wsteth-on-aave-v3-ethereum-core/25470"},{"id":"svr-march-allocation","title":"March 2026 LlamaRisk review of SVR allocation and L2 expansion","url":"https://governance.aave.com/t/arfc-aave-chainlink-svr-multi-network-expansion-base-arbitrum/24241/4"},{"id":"ccip-gho-window-20260921","title":"Reviewed GHO outbound CCIP messages and per-message provenance","url":"https://linkmarketcap.org/datasets/ccip-gho.json"},{"id":"ccip-api-message-search","title":"CCIP API: filtered messages and cursor pagination","url":"https://docs.chain.link/ccip/tools/api/get-messages"},{"id":"ccip-billing-mechanics","title":"CCIP network and blockchain fees","url":"https://docs.chain.link/ccip/billing"},{"id":"official-reserve-metrics","title":"Chainlink official reserve metrics feed","url":"https://metrics.chain.link/api/reserve/latest"},{"id":"official-ccip-volume","title":"Chainlink official aggregate metrics feed","url":"https://metrics.chain.link/api/metrics/latest"},{"id":"recipient-ledger-20260921","title":"Reviewed nine-recipient Ethereum LINK ledger through September 21, 2026","url":"https://github.com/sethweiland/linkmarketcap/blob/a5d6b22afcda87cb17ca35e1a1138299eacfc9e7/data/wallet-followups.json"},{"id":"shared-deposit-explorer-label","title":"Blockscout deposit-address label (archived September 16, 2026)","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/address/0xfe9529b753b412941127fea1981e5ce0a85c101e"},{"id":"node-v265","title":"Chainlink node v2.65.0 release","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/releases/tag/v2.65.0"},{"id":"node-v265-diff","title":"v2.64.0 to v2.65.0 source comparison","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/compare/v2.64.0...v2.65.0"},{"id":"node-v265-go-mod","title":"Pinned node v2.65.0 dependencies","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/1568d3dfa8f74cbfbcd102cdac2adeeb429829c3/go.mod"},{"id":"common-cleanup-v265-ancestry","title":"Shared library cleanup versus pinned node dependency","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink-common/compare/538f4bf0cb6f9b6109493b26601c007bdd5c00b6...10cc2b41997e2866eb88ad086fc9da237b7bcc5e"},{"id":"common-cleanup-pr2382","title":"Chainlink common legacy host removal PR 2382","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink-common/pull/2382"},{"id":"cre-v265-ancestry","title":"cre commit versus v2.65.0","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/compare/eddf5109401b34c0d3bb62c61ae5bc7a705af49a...v2.65.0"},{"id":"connector-v265-ancestry","title":"connector commit versus v2.65.0","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/compare/39de8244b2b7aa3ff49b56f642253e5c8b3c3347...v2.65.0"},{"id":"cosmos-v265-ancestry","title":"cosmos commit versus v2.65.0","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/compare/fa897c3d55f584de6ece6255c061b8ef6904d0d5...v2.65.0"},{"id":"reserve-funding-ledger-20260923","title":"Reviewed reserve funding dataset and transaction identities, September 23","url":"https://github.com/sethweiland/linkmarketcap/blob/2ae1b98c15b89529850367fd33ed3528d844a4bc/data/reserve-study.json"},{"id":"payment-reserves-verified","title":"Verified Payment Abstraction Reserves contract","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/address/0x5680681ED3767B96914CE741a308155C7fB9171d?tab=contract"},{"id":"payment-auction-verified","title":"Verified GPV2-compatible payment auction and BaseAuction source","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/address/0x8f3B89E0A78D16eaB1493cC8bBC6F6F33339bc70?tab=contract"},{"id":"reserve-deposit-20260917","title":"September 17 reserve allocation and transfer","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x6c5223c73a3abbd5117afa7e29c6993dca778e05ae90c3349eefd3e07ed7f92d"},{"id":"payment-existing-link-20260917","title":"September 17 existing LINK forwarding","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x45099a016d3d0b69ae26c9d8c446db8add72778889d04b004238830baf12ce83"},{"id":"payment-auction-end-20260917","title":"September 17 auction end and pooled LINK sweep","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x29594ea6194f53d9b0a6008cf5e7c37e0e759754a741a76cc80d813a5bd2aaac"},{"id":"triggerCoordinator-closed-20260925","title":"CRE coordinator PR closed without merge","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/pull/23780"},{"id":"subscriptionCache-handler-20260925","title":"Pinned cache read/write gating in CRE handler","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/1e993f6c10318186802550b22bd6b7962c437a6f/core/services/workflows/syncer/v2/handler.go"},{"id":"subscriptionCache-engine-20260925","title":"Pinned subscription reuse and limits","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/1e993f6c10318186802550b22bd6b7962c437a6f/core/services/workflows/v2/engine.go"},{"id":"subscriptionCache-default-20260925","title":"Subscription cache defaults off","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/1e993f6c10318186802550b22bd6b7962c437a6f/core/config/docs/core.toml"},{"id":"reserve-deposit-20260924","title":"September 24 reserve deposit transaction","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0xbdb41b5ed02c143ed3e348749c7c8517d375f6e4c15817405bd3437605980c41"},{"id":"aave-cre-plasma-20260925","title":"LlamaRisk reports Plasma PT Risk Oracle deployment awaiting agent activation","url":"https://governance.aave.com/t/arfc-upgrade-pt-risk-oracle-to-protocol-owned-infrastructure-on-cre/25119/5"},{"id":"wallet-rotation-funding-20260925","title":"September 25 funding of an earlier recipient","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x311c741b8d34aa2593d5e63a8825c7d487f22962b8f5d6e530d46528ad03ba98"},{"id":"recipient-ledger-20260925","title":"Nine-recipient LINK ledger reviewed September 25","url":"https://github.com/sethweiland/linkmarketcap/blob/f2e1f34140bfaa37caaf0b0759b85e23780f9a64/data/wallet-followups.json"},{"id":"wallet-rotation-20260925-0","title":"September 25 distribution payment 1","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x0faef9548a128aad628865046464d9caa878c835d252f87bcc5d608514d95cfe"},{"id":"wallet-rotation-20260925-1","title":"September 25 distribution payment 2","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x380356f8aa8ee575c1f92edc8e8923fb2594eb09cabaaaeb59780dd3636b9e5a"},{"id":"wallet-rotation-20260925-2","title":"September 25 distribution payment 3","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x38bcd395d148670c112351ef01a1f2578765d06d2993c7e92a4a95e79b1ca690"},{"id":"wallet-rotation-20260925-3","title":"September 25 distribution payment 4","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x878783236a3b17f48fd9ec2eb4eb7f7a7d8178504d269652e78565b3e401df13"},{"id":"wallet-rotation-20260925-4","title":"September 25 distribution payment 5","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x4c71f1cc3f860a6981bf8d78d42f020c80a358075fb776dcbd65a84f5fec99ba"},{"id":"wallet-rotation-20260925-5","title":"September 25 distribution payment 6","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x16fa927ee2cb1a5011061b9bc92ab2c896f6fb5bf6b709d19dba73181c49d748"},{"id":"wallet-rotation-20260925-6","title":"September 25 distribution payment 7","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x018c1b1f6bbc1113ac02c28b312b9e1874792d7821809da365d4fd809561c380"},{"id":"wallet-rotation-20260925-7","title":"September 25 distribution payment 8","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x5b97dfb5cd6bfd3e32f5c63a359636bd805b3dc30f891b45f4ebc0569be7056b"},{"id":"wallet-rotation-20260925-8","title":"September 25 distribution payment 9","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0xeff8d416e40470be0256c252faecd74cb0f26b5527ffb2de9bf7b9d5dcef5f9c"},{"id":"recipient-ledger-20260927","title":"Nine-recipient LINK ledger through September 27, collection completed September 28","url":"https://linkmarketcap.org/datasets/wallet-followups.json"},{"id":"reserve-funding-ledger-20260928","title":"Reserve funding study through September 27, 2026","url":"https://linkmarketcap.org/datasets/reserve-funding.json"},{"id":"node-release-v266","title":"Core node v2.66.0 published release","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/releases/tag/v2.66.0"},{"id":"cosmos-v266-ancestry","title":"Cosmos removal inclusion in v2.66.0","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/compare/fa897c3d55f584de6ece6255c061b8ef6904d0d5...16456b34a8db32e0acd36a2468aac8dc7a5c8144"},{"id":"postgres-v266-source","title":"PostgreSQL version check at v2.66.0 commit","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/16456b34a8db32e0acd36a2468aac8dc7a5c8144/core/services/pg/connection.go"},{"id":"plugins-v266-source","title":"Core-node plugin list at v2.66.0 commit","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/16456b34a8db32e0acd36a2468aac8dc7a5c8144/plugins/plugins.public.yaml"},{"id":"swift-cre-announcement-20260928","title":"Chainlink announcement of CRE connectivity for the Swift ledger","url":"https://chain.link/press-releases/chainlink-is-enabling-financial-institutions-to-connect-to-swifts-blockchain-ledger"},{"id":"aave-labs-september-2026","title":"Aave Labs September 2026 development report","url":"https://governance.aave.com/t/al-development-update-september-2026/25744"},{"id":"node-v266-common-pin","title":"Core node v2.66.0 pinned shared-library dependency","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/16456b34a8db32e0acd36a2468aac8dc7a5c8144/go.mod"},{"id":"payments-contracts-20261003","title":"Reviewed Ethereum CCIP OnRamp and VRF coordinator implementations","url":"https://github.com/sethweiland/linkmarketcap/tree/improve/weekly-holder-metrics/data/evidence/payments/2026-10-03"},{"id":"ccip-current-ethereum-directory","title":"Chainlink Ethereum CCIP deployments","url":"https://docs.chain.link/ccip/directory/mainnet/chain/mainnet"},{"id":"vrf-v25-billing","title":"Chainlink VRF v2.5 billing","url":"https://docs.chain.link/vrf/v2-5/billing"},{"id":"recipient-ledger-20261003","title":"Nine-recipient LINK ledger through October 1, collection completed October 3","url":"https://github.com/sethweiland/linkmarketcap/blob/improve/weekly-holder-metrics/data/evidence/wallets/2026-10-03/recipient-ledger.json"},{"id":"node-release-v267","title":"Core node v2.67.0 release","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/releases/tag/v2.67.0"},{"id":"node-v267-postgres-source","title":"Released PostgreSQL minimum","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/df15279b3ab71f1e86f5deed72647949e69d3d7f/core/services/pg/connection.go"},{"id":"node-v267-docker-source","title":"Released PostgreSQL client","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/df15279b3ab71f1e86f5deed72647949e69d3d7f/core/chainlink.Dockerfile"},{"id":"node-v267-balance-source","title":"Released ERC-20 balance monitoring configuration","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/df15279b3ab71f1e86f5deed72647949e69d3d7f/core/config/docs/chains-evm.toml"},{"id":"node-v267-balance-implementation","title":"Pinned EVM ERC-20 balance monitor","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink-evm/blob/cc645fce4250/pkg/monitor/balance.go"},{"id":"node-v267-dependencies","title":"Released node dependency pins","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/df15279b3ab71f1e86f5deed72647949e69d3d7f/go.mod"},{"id":"node-v267-bridge-cache","title":"Released bridge observation cache","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/df15279b3ab71f1e86f5deed72647949e69d3d7f/core/services/pipeline/bridgeconn/bridge_conn_manager.go"},{"id":"subscriptionCache-merge-20261005","title":"Merged cache PR #23774","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/pull/23774"},{"id":"subscriptionCache-engine-20261005","title":"Merged cache reuse and empty-subscription handling","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/e4a454a601bf6c6abbcc17bbc2c7079650534500/core/services/workflows/v2/base_engine.go"},{"id":"subscriptionCache-handler-20261005","title":"Merged cache persistence and parsing","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/e4a454a601bf6c6abbcc17bbc2c7079650534500/core/services/workflows/syncer/v2/handler.go"},{"id":"subscriptionCache-default-20261005","title":"Merged cache default configuration","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/e4a454a601bf6c6abbcc17bbc2c7079650534500/core/config/docs/core.toml"},{"id":"subscriptionCache-v267-ancestry","title":"Cache merge compared with v2.67.0","url":"https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/compare/e4a454a601bf6c6abbcc17bbc2c7079650534500...df15279b3ab71f1e86f5deed72647949e69d3d7f"},{"id":"official-ccip-volume-20261007","title":"Archived October 6 publication of September CCIP volume","url":"https://github.com/sethweiland/linkmarketcap/blob/improve/weekly-holder-metrics/data/evidence/core/2026-10-07/metrics.json"},{"id":"recipient-ledger-20261007","title":"Nine-recipient LINK ledger through October 5, collection completed October 7","url":"https://github.com/sethweiland/linkmarketcap/blob/improve/weekly-holder-metrics/data/evidence/wallets/2026-10-07/recipient-ledger.json"},{"id":"reserve-funding-ledger-20261008","title":"Reserve funding study through October 4, 2026","url":"https://linkmarketcap.org/datasets/reserve-funding.json"},{"id":"reserve-deposit-20261008","title":"October 8 Payment Abstraction transfer to the reserve","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0xf978d26d9def696258b041d104e9ac166e492ab81802e175a0f2d50fd76598a0"},{"id":"recipient-ledger-20261009","title":"Nine-recipient LINK ledger through October 8, collection completed October 9","url":"https://github.com/sethweiland/linkmarketcap/blob/improve/weekly-holder-metrics/data/evidence/wallets/2026-10-09/recipient-ledger.json"},{"id":"ccip-gho-window-20261010","title":"Reviewed 90-day outbound Ethereum GHO CCIP dataset through October 9, 2026","url":"https://linkmarketcap.org/datasets/ccip-gho.json"},{"id":"ccip-gho-inbound-example-20261010","title":"Single verified Plasma-to-Ethereum GHO CCIP delivery and fee detail","url":"https://linkmarketcap.org/datasets/ccip-inbound-example.json"},{"id":"ccip-gho-inbound-message-20261010","title":"Chainlink CCIP message record for inbound GHO example","url":"https://api.ccip.chain.link/v2/messages/0x9e5889c10b315810de0a623629a48651fe9bfbfedd8b3417d91e77a19a83b5e1"},{"id":"ccip-gho-inbound-receipt-20261010","title":"Ethereum receipt for inbound GHO example","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x6fbe4b9d487623db144e1caedbdeaec4fcf2bd046fdb3601d9653a7e2d60236d"},{"id":"ccip-gho-inbound-wxpl-20261010","title":"Plasma WXPL fee-token contract","url":"https://plasmascan.to/token/0x6100E367285b01F48D07953803A2d8dCA5D19873"},{"id":"ccip-gho-inbound-example-20261011","title":"Five CCIP inbound GHO examples matched to Ethereum OffRamp receipts and pool logs","url":"https://linkmarketcap.org/datasets/ccip-inbound-example.json"},{"id":"ccip-gho-inbound-message-ink-20261011","title":"CCIP message from Ink to Ethereum, 100,090 GHO","url":"https://api.ccip.chain.link/v2/messages/0x30c7eab40dc359e268a3e9f7ddad6bd86cbdcc075e096d014b359beb0d554d07"},{"id":"ccip-gho-inbound-message-plasma-a-20261011","title":"CCIP message from Plasma to Ethereum, 23,702.862 GHO","url":"https://api.ccip.chain.link/v2/messages/0x5703860dabd6ada8f0bd49bf9f2a03e977c360acfc38869368681170711ada8c"},{"id":"ccip-gho-inbound-message-plasma-b-20261011","title":"CCIP message from Plasma to Ethereum, 4,550 GHO","url":"https://api.ccip.chain.link/v2/messages/0x93a74f7385de77624c7b99dfc0c6983491a174c068fee6123810b51d93f0cce9"},{"id":"ccip-gho-inbound-receipt-ink-20261011","title":"Ethereum OffRamp receipt for 100,090 GHO from Ink","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0xc97426f6b8f92d03196c690b6910c2e8ec8b9a46cb6600a27d2d9e67618f49bb"},{"id":"ccip-gho-inbound-receipt-plasma-a-20261011","title":"Ethereum OffRamp receipt for 23,702.862 GHO from Plasma","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x96807032c0f5abb6f54be25158a0d63f64a522e7606579b4da2859842e256612"},{"id":"ccip-gho-inbound-receipt-plasma-b-20261011","title":"Ethereum OffRamp receipt for 4,550 GHO from Plasma","url":"https://eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x5acd023a504ce52213c6b3cd2868a5666caf550f8d2c3af82290754ffb7d01be"},{"id":"ink-weth-token","title":"Ink WETH fee token","url":"https://explorer.inkonchain.com/token/0x4200000000000000000000000000000000000006"}],"claims":[{"id":"cre-role","kind":"fact","status":"active","statement":"CRE coordinates workflows that connect offchain data and onchain actions, running them across Chainlink oracle networks.","scope":"CRE product architecture","sourceIds":["cre-docs"],"observedAt":"2026-09-14T02:54:25.238167+00:00","reviewedAt":"2026-09-14T02:54:25.238167+00:00","recheckAfterDays":90,"reviewTrigger":"Official architecture or execution model changes."},{"id":"link-distribution","kind":"fact","status":"active","statement":"Transfers can redistribute LINK between addresses without changing total token supply. Circulating supply and total supply are different quantities.","scope":"ERC-20 balances; do not sum wrapped representations across chains as native LINK supply","sourceIds":["erc20"],"observedAt":"2026-09-14T02:54:25.238167+00:00","reviewedAt":"2026-09-14T02:54:25.238167+00:00","recheckAfterDays":90,"reviewTrigger":"Token accounting or circulation methodology changes."},{"id":"reserve-path","kind":"fact","status":"active","statement":"Payment Abstraction converts payment assets into LINK. The Reserve accumulates LINK sourced from onchain service fees and offchain enterprise revenue. A reserve deposit is downstream of payment and conversion.","scope":"Reserve design, not proof of the origin of each deposit","sourceIds":["reserve-design"],"observedAt":"2026-09-14T02:54:25.238167+00:00","reviewedAt":"2026-09-14T02:54:25.238167+00:00","recheckAfterDays":90,"reviewTrigger":"Reserve contracts, routing or funding policy changes."},{"id":"cre-host-cleanup","kind":"hypothesis","status":"superseded","statement":"The removal of legacy workflow-host options is consistent with consolidation of the workflow execution layer.","scope":"PR 23727 only; not release, deployment, performance or adoption evidence","sourceIds":["cre-pr"],"observedAt":"2026-09-12T14:55:09.164258+00:00","reviewedAt":"2026-09-12T14:55:09.164258+00:00","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"PR head/state, dependency pin or release inclusion changes.","revision":"a04e49eb1d6070e9d6c147df3fd9556d050908e1","monitorSourceIds":["cre","creDependency","releases"],"supersededBy":"cre-host-cleanup-merged"},{"id":"gho-source-call","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"A successful ccipSend transaction includes 372,313.091328541175442568 GHO transferred into the attributed Ethereum pool.","scope":"One source transaction only; destination execution, customer identity and fees unverified","sourceIds":["gho-example"],"observedAt":"2026-09-13T14:08:47Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-13T15:52:41.942Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"Transaction correction, reorganization or matched destination evidence.","monitorSourceIds":["gho"]},{"id":"cre-connector-original","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"The inspected PR 23728 patch retained compute_action while removing web API connector paths.","scope":"Historical patch; no longer the current interpretation","sourceIds":["cre-removal-pr"],"observedAt":"2026-09-12T23:03:17.585Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-12T23:03:17.585Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"Superseded by a changed patch.","revision":"031b498","supersededBy":"cre-connector-correction"},{"id":"cre-connector-correction","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"The later PR 23728 patch removes compute_action too, retaining workflow_syncer in the outgoing connector.","scope":"Correction to the earlier internal patch review; not a deployment claim","sourceIds":["cre-removal-pr"],"observedAt":"2026-09-13T15:52:41.942Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-13T15:52:41.942Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"PR head/state or patch changes.","revision":"a33523f355589695b68d7ac435c517f3eba56943","monitorSourceIds":["openPulls"],"supersededBy":"cre-connector-merged"},{"id":"cre-host-cleanup-merged","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"PR 23727 merged on September 14, 2026 with the previously inspected head. Its merge commit is not an ancestor of v2.64.0.","scope":"GitHub merge and tag ancestry, not proof of deployed production usage; equivalent changes by another route not exhaustively checked.","sourceIds":["cre-pr","cre-v264-ancestry"],"observedAt":"2026-09-15T02:01:21.368Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-15T03:43:44.243024+00:00","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"Revert, dependency change, new containing release or deployment evidence.","revision":"eddf5109401b34c0d3bb62c61ae5bc7a705af49a","monitorSourceIds":["cre","creDependency","releases"],"supersededBy":"cre-cleanup-released-v265-20260921"},{"id":"automation-removal-v264","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"Node v2.64.0 removes the legacy ocr2automation plugin; the official Automation documentation directs migrations to CRE.","scope":"Published software and documented migration path; application retention and fee migration unmeasured.","sourceIds":["node-v264","automation-sunset"],"observedAt":"2026-09-15T02:01:21.368Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-15T03:43:44.243024+00:00","recheckAfterDays":14,"reviewTrigger":"Release correction, revised migration guidance or verified application migration outcomes.","monitorSourceIds":["releases"]},{"id":"cre-connector-merged","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"PR 23728 merged on September 15, 2026 with head a33523f355589695b68d7ac435c517f3eba56943. The reviewed connector patch removes compute_action and legacy web API methods while retaining workflow_syncer. Its merge commit is not an ancestor of v2.64.0.","scope":"GitHub merge and selected connector patches; release deployment and equivalent changes by another route are not established.","sourceIds":["cre-removal-pr","cre-connector-v264-ancestry"],"observedAt":"2026-09-15T05:23:57Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-15T15:11:23.772Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"Revert, containing release or verified deployment evidence.","revision":"39de8244b2b7aa3ff49b56f642253e5c8b3c3347","monitorSourceIds":["releases","openPulls"],"supersededBy":"cre-cleanup-released-v265-20260921"},{"id":"gho-governance-launch-funding","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"Two governance-executed 50M GHO mint-and-bridge transactions funded the Arbitrum and Monad Remote GSM launches. Their pool deposits total 100M GHO and 50.674% of recorded Ethereum pool inflows from June 18 through September 14, 2026. CCIP reports both messages successful; matched source payments total 0.117065724794582431 LINK.","scope":"Two explicitly traced launch messages, not recurring customer demand, total CCIP fees, profit or verified downstream GSM usage. Destination success is reported by the CCIP API; receipts not independently replayed.","sourceIds":["gho-launch-arbitrum-proposal","gho-launch-arbitrum-tx","gho-launch-arbitrum-message","gho-launch-monad-proposal","gho-launch-monad-tx","gho-launch-monad-message"],"observedAt":"2026-09-16T03:20:07.949326Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-16T03:20:07.949326Z","recheckAfterDays":30,"reviewTrigger":"Receipt or provider correction, ledger window change, attribution correction, or new evidence of subsequent reserve/GSM use.","supersededBy":"gho-launch-window-2026-09-16"},{"id":"cosmos-removal-proposed","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"Core-node PR 23734 proposes removing the Cosmos plugin, related relayer construction, configuration, command-line commands, key handling and HTTP routes. The release note calls this deprecated support. The reviewed PR is open and no longer draft.","scope":"Selected patches at the pinned head; not a merged release, production shutdown, all Cosmos services, user impact or measured fee change.","sourceIds":["cosmos-removal-pr"],"observedAt":"2026-09-16T03:27:35.458Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-16T03:30:08.304662Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"Head/state changes, merge, release inclusion or verified operator migration.","revision":"b29bd60801fae94196ef861f920580332f6179a5","monitorSourceIds":["openPulls","releases"],"supersededBy":"cosmos-removal-merged"},{"id":"wallet-nine-transfers","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"On September 16, 2026, 0x0757e27ac1631beeb37eed3270cc6301dd3d57d4 sent 100,000 LINK to 0x020e3cb2db423994eb70156bb87299f68b7ef11f. Within 84 seconds, the recipient sent nine indexed transfers of 10,000 LINK to nine different addresses.","scope":"Blockscout-indexed Ethereum LINK transfers. Sequence only; the recipient already had transaction history. Common ownership, the source of the outgoing funds, recipient purpose and sales are unverified.","sourceIds":["wallet-sequence-incoming","wallet-sequence-recipient"],"observedAt":"2026-09-16T13:42:55.983Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-16T13:42:55.983Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"Indexer correction, verified recipient attribution, or evidence that changes the sequence interpretation.","monitorSourceIds":["largeWallet"]},{"id":"cosmos-removal-merged","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"Core-node PR 23734 merged on 2026-09-16T15:50:48Z with unchanged reviewed head b29bd60801fae94196ef861f920580332f6179a5. The patch removes the deprecated Cosmos plugin and related node interfaces. Merge commit fa897c3d55f584de6ece6255c061b8ef6904d0d5 is not an ancestor of v2.64.0.","scope":"Reviewed GitHub merge and ancestry; not proof all Cosmos services have ended, equivalent changes by other routes are absent, or operators have deployed the removal.","sourceIds":["cosmos-removal-pr","cosmos-v264-ancestry"],"observedAt":"2026-09-16T19:35:28.913Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-16T19:38:22.081Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"Revert, release containing the merge, or verified operator deployment.","revision":"fa897c3d55f584de6ece6255c061b8ef6904d0d5","monitorSourceIds":["openPulls","releases"],"supersededBy":"cosmos-removal-outside-v265-20260921"},{"id":"gho-launch-window-2026-09-16","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"Two governance-executed 50M GHO mint-and-bridge transactions funded the Arbitrum and Monad Remote GSM launches. Their pool deposits total 100M GHO and 50.294% of recorded Ethereum pool inflows from 2026-06-19 through 2026-09-15. The reviewed CCIP bundle reports both messages successful; matched source payments total 0.117065724794582431 LINK.","scope":"Two explicitly traced launch messages, not recurring customer demand, total CCIP fees, profit or verified downstream GSM usage. Destination success is reported by the CCIP API; receipts not independently replayed. Seed evidence dates are retained in data/gho-investigation.json; this update replays that reviewed evidence against the refreshed ledger.","sourceIds":["gho-launch-arbitrum-proposal","gho-launch-arbitrum-tx","gho-launch-arbitrum-message","gho-launch-monad-proposal","gho-launch-monad-tx","gho-launch-monad-message"],"observedAt":"2026-09-16T19:37:30.839Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-16T19:40:19.680Z","recheckAfterDays":30,"reviewTrigger":"Receipt or provider correction, ledger window change, attribution correction, or new evidence of subsequent reserve/GSM use."},{"id":"wallet-recipient-return","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"One of the nine recipients sent 11,315.501064328064532713 LINK to the original funding address on September 17 at 14:46:23 UTC.","scope":"One successful LINK transfer, cross-checked between indexed transfer and transaction responses. This is not a complete recipient follow-up scan. Purpose, common ownership and provenance of the transferred LINK remain unknown.","sourceIds":["wallet-return-20260917","wallet-sequence-recipient"],"observedAt":"2026-09-17T23:22:32.787Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-18T01:26:20.209Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"Indexer correction, repeated return paths, or primary evidence identifies the role of either wallet. Do not infer the original allocation was returned.","monitorSourceIds":["largeWallet"]},{"id":"wallet-repeated-returns-20260918","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"Two of the nine recipients and the distributor sent 44,959.288199111698713382 LINK to the original funding address in four verified transfers from September 17 at 14:46:23 UTC through September 18 at 03:10:59 UTC.","scope":"Four individually verified Ethereum LINK transfers to the original funding address. Bounded source-wallet sample, not complete recipient history, original-allocation retention, beneficial ownership, or payment purpose.","sourceIds":["wallet-return-20260917","wallet-return-580d17be","wallet-return-7dd84f82","wallet-return-c8838b7e"],"observedAt":"2026-09-18T03:22:21.266Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-18T10:46:56.271Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"Additional exact-address transfers, indexer correction, or primary evidence explains ownership or purpose. The four transfers do not establish how much of the original allocation was returned.","monitorSourceIds":["largeWallet"],"supersededBy":"wallet-expanded-returns-20260918"},{"id":"wallet-expanded-returns-20260918","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"Four of the nine recipients and the distributor sent 126558.743824327586025931 LINK to the original funding address in eleven verified transfers from September17 10:10:11 UTC through September18 15:35:23 UTC.","scope":"Eleven individually verified transfers from four original recipients and the distributor to the original funding address. Bounded source-wallet sample, not complete recipient history, original-allocation retention, beneficial ownership, or payment purpose.","sourceIds":["wallet-return-678f5e5c","wallet-return-20260917","wallet-return-580d17be","wallet-return-7dd84f82","wallet-return-c8838b7e","wallet-return-978259d5","wallet-return-af6b869d","wallet-return-f3a906ee","wallet-return-5fb65724","wallet-return-280d46d5","wallet-return-eb0e3e7e"],"observedAt":"2026-09-18T17:37:41.595Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-18T17:40:51.691Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"New matching transfers, source corrections, or primary attribution. Gross return flows exceed the initial funding; do not treat this as retention or repayment of the original allocation.","monitorSourceIds":["largeWallet"]},{"id":"triggerCoordinator-proposed-20260918","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"A draft change moves the handling of events that start workflows into a shared coordinator. It separates registering and acknowledging those events from running the workflow itself. The coordinator is not connected to the production execution path in the reviewed patch.","scope":"Selected draft patch at the pinned head; no released performance, adoption or fee claim.","sourceIds":["triggerCoordinator-draft"],"observedAt":"2026-09-18T18:13:09.667Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-18T18:14:25.399Z","recheckAfterDays":3,"reviewTrigger":"Head or status changes, production wiring, containing release or measured deployment evidence.","revision":"0a025aea520a2e12d602f5534df0852f09aa9f82","monitorSourceIds":["triggerCoordinator","releases"],"supersededBy":"triggerCoordinator-closed-20260925"},{"id":"subscriptionCache-proposed-20260918","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"A draft change saves a workflow’s trigger subscriptions so later engine starts can reuse them. With the feature enabled, a cached result skips that part of the workflow’s setup code. No measured startup improvement or production rollout has been verified.","scope":"Selected draft patch at the pinned head; no released performance, adoption or fee claim.","sourceIds":["subscriptionCache-draft"],"observedAt":"2026-09-18T18:13:10.104Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-18T18:14:25.400Z","recheckAfterDays":3,"reviewTrigger":"Head or status changes, production wiring, containing release or measured deployment evidence.","revision":"47be7ecbae49e14f170e2074604b24c06965c448","monitorSourceIds":["subscriptionCache","releases"],"supersededBy":"subscriptionCache-config-20260919"},{"id":"subscriptionCache-config-20260919","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"The revised draft PR 23774 wires cached trigger-subscription reuse through the node-level CRE.CachedTriggerSubscriptionsEnabled setting, which defaults to false. The engine skips its WASM Subscribe call only when cached subscriptions exist and that setting is enabled. Writing cached data is separate from enabling reuse.","scope":"Inspected draft patches at the pinned revision; no merge, production rollout, measured performance, adoption or fee claim.","sourceIds":["subscriptionCache-config-20260919","subscriptionCache-engine-20260919"],"observedAt":"2026-09-19T16:33:30.746Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-19T20:40:29.743Z","recheckAfterDays":3,"reviewTrigger":"PR head/status, configuration default, release inclusion or verified rollout changes.","revision":"79e056b1f7999a0e518465cc8e271b30122eeffd","monitorSourceIds":["subscriptionCache","releases"],"supersededBy":"subscriptionCache-open-20260921"},{"id":"subscriptionCache-open-20260921","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"PR 23774 is open and no longer marked draft at the same reviewed code revision. Cached trigger-subscription reuse still requires existing cached data and the CRE.CachedTriggerSubscriptionsEnabled setting, which defaults to false. The PR remains unmerged.","scope":"GitHub PR status and previously inspected unchanged code revision; no production rollout, measured performance, adoption or fee claim.","sourceIds":["subscriptionCache-config-20260919","subscriptionCache-engine-20260919","subscriptionCache-status-20260921"],"observedAt":"2026-09-21T00:37:47.775Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-21T00:44:35.023Z","recheckAfterDays":3,"reviewTrigger":"PR head/status, configuration default, release inclusion or verified rollout changes.","revision":"79e056b1f7999a0e518465cc8e271b30122eeffd","monitorSourceIds":["subscriptionCache","releases"],"supersededBy":"subscriptionCache-gated-write-20260925"},{"id":"wallet-repeat-distribution-20260921","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"On September 20 the original funding address sent 71000 LINK to the same distributor. Within 168 seconds the distributor sent 7100 LINK each to the exact nine addresses that received 10000 LINK each on September 16. The nine transfers total 63900 LINK; both observed rounds equal 90% of their preceding funding transaction amounts.","scope":"Nine successful direct LINK transfers to the exact original recipient addresses. Transaction calls and indexed logs were checked. Same-recipient recurrence and transfer-amount ratios do not establish common ownership, payment purpose, retained balances or provenance of particular tokens.","sourceIds":["wallet-sequence-incoming","wallet-sequence-recipient","wallet-repeat-20260920-0","wallet-repeat-20260920-1","wallet-repeat-20260920-2","wallet-repeat-20260920-3","wallet-repeat-20260920-4","wallet-repeat-20260920-5","wallet-repeat-20260920-6","wallet-repeat-20260920-7","wallet-repeat-20260920-8","wallet-repeat-20260920-9"],"observedAt":"2026-09-21T00:42:34.055Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-21T00:44:35.023Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"New distribution rounds, changed transaction/log evidence, or primary attribution of the addresses or payment purpose.","monitorSourceIds":["largeWallet"]},{"id":"svr-reported-allocation-20260921","kind":"observation","statement":"The July 24, 2026 Chainlink Q2 report describes cumulative SVR proceeds above $23M, with approximately $15M allocated to integrated protocols and $8M to the Chainlink Network. These are reported, rounded cumulative allocations.","scope":"Company report, not independently reconciled net income, Q2-only revenue, LINK purchases or reserve receipt. Exact cutoff is unspecified.","sourceIds":["svr-q2-report"],"recheckAfterDays":30,"reviewTrigger":"New quarterly disclosure, correction, or verified allocation and settlement evidence.","status":"active","observedAt":"2026-09-21T01:22:16.254Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-21T01:23:55.237897Z"},{"id":"svr-provider-coverage-20260921","kind":"observation","statement":"LlamaRisk daily histories and its separate financial summary do not fully reconcile. Market histories end on different dates; Ethereum Core ends August 11, 2026 in this snapshot. Monad has no daily records. No completeness watermark is supplied. The summary Chainlink allocation does not identify builder costs separately.","scope":"Six public dashboard API responses archived in data/evidence/svr/2026-09-21. Missing observations are unknown, not zero. Only published records support the historical charts.","sourceIds":["svr-llamarisk-dashboard","svr-financial-api","svr-march-allocation"],"monitorSourceIds":["svrFinancial","svrCore","svrPrime","svrArbitrum","svrBase","svrMonad"],"recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"Changed or removed historical rows, new markets, allocation definition change, or reconciliation evidence.","status":"superseded","observedAt":"2026-09-21T01:22:16.254Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-21T01:23:55.237897Z","supersededBy":"svr-provider-coverage-20261010"},{"id":"svr-provider-coverage-20261010","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"The October 10 LlamaRisk snapshot contains 579 market-day records. Since the September 21 reviewed snapshot, it adds 10 Arbitrum and 9 Base daily records through October 8 and revises the September 21 record in both markets. Ethereum Core still ends August 11, Ethereum Prime August 3, and Monad has no daily records. The separate financial summary reports $21,792,949.96 recaptured, $41,188,472.21 in liquidation bonuses, $889,201,069.98 in liquidations, $14,165,417.47 allocated to Aave and $7,627,532.49 labelled Chainlink.","scope":"Six LlamaRisk Aave V3 API responses archived in data/evidence/svr/2026-10-10. Daily records sum to $21,741,396.24, leaving the same $51,553.72 difference from the separate financial summary as the prior snapshot. The API supplies no completeness watermark; missing dates and an empty market are unknown, not zero. The Chainlink-labelled share does not identify builder costs and is not net Chainlink income, LINK purchases or reserve deposits.","sourceIds":["svr-llamarisk-dashboard","svr-financial-api","svr-march-allocation"],"monitorSourceIds":["svrFinancial","svrCore","svrPrime","svrArbitrum","svrBase","svrMonad"],"observedAt":"2026-10-10T06:33:27.775Z","reviewedAt":"2026-10-10T06:36:46Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"Changed or removed historical rows, new markets, allocation definition change, or reconciliation evidence."},{"id":"svr-lpf-exposure-20260921","kind":"hypothesis","statement":"LlamaRisk proposes increasing the liquidation protocol fee from 10% to 20% for WBTC, WETH and wstETH on Aave V3 Ethereum Core. Its model assumes the extra fee displaces SVR bids from the same bonus. This could change SVR proceeds per liquidation even if adoption is unchanged.","scope":"Proposal and economic hypothesis, not verified implementation or measured lost revenue. Closed discussion is not governance enactment. The asset share in the chart is historical gross-proceeds exposure, not a loss forecast.","sourceIds":["svr-lpf-proposal","svr-llamarisk-dashboard"],"monitorSourceIds":["svrFeeProposal","aaveEconomics"],"recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"Executed governance payload and block-specific parameter readings; comparable before/after liquidations, bonuses, auction bids and liquidator margins.","status":"active","observedAt":"2026-09-21T01:22:16.254Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-21T01:23:55.237897Z"},{"id":"ccip-gho-repeat-20260921","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"From June 23 through September 20, 2026, the CCIP API returned 882 outbound Ethereum GHO messages. Two documented launch messages moved 100M of 198.210186943M GHO. Excluding those two messages, 174 origin addresses were active in the first 30-day period; 41 returned in the second and 28 in the third. There were 346 origins across the 90-day window, of which 108 sent on multiple days.","scope":"Provider-paginated outbound Ethereum GHO token messages only. This is origin-address repeat use, not customer or application retention. Other operations are unclassified; inbound and other-source-chain activity is excluded. First-period addresses are not proven new users. Six selected messages have fee details; no complete fee total, service-fee split or net income.","sourceIds":["ccip-gho-window-20260921","ccip-api-message-search","gho-launch-arbitrum-proposal","gho-launch-monad-proposal","ccip-billing-mechanics"],"observedAt":"2026-09-21T01:54:11.795Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-21T02:06:37.879Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"Window changes, missing or revised message records, attribution changes, launch classification changes, provider coverage or fee corrections.","supersededBy":"ccip-gho-repeat-20261010"},{"id":"reserve-holdings-20260921","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"The official reserve feed reports 5,959,392.92983903 LINK and $74,628,285.7817882 at $12.5228 per LINK. Its daily LINK history begins August 7, 2025. Historical running USD balances appear repriced at the latest quote and are not used as historical valuations.","scope":"Official reserve holdings snapshot and provider daily history; all holdings, separate from Payment Abstraction inflows. Runtime values retain their own dates.","sourceIds":["official-reserve-metrics"],"observedAt":"2026-09-21T02:15:51.952Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-21T03:05:45.244113Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"monitorSourceIds":["reserveHoldings"],"reviewTrigger":"Changed reserve balances, accounting definition, price reconciliation or historical corrections.","supersededBy":"reserve-holdings-20260925"},{"id":"ccip-volume-20260921","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"The official CCIP series reports $24.1165B cumulative token-transfer volume through August 2026. Consecutive month-end differences imply $1.2127B in August, down about 8.6% from July. This feed supplies no daily CCIP fees or fee split.","scope":"Chainlink provider-filtered CCIP token-transfer volume, July 2023 through August 2026. Not unique capital, customer counts or fees.","sourceIds":["official-ccip-volume"],"observedAt":"2026-09-02T22:41:49.631005Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-21T03:05:45.244113Z","recheckAfterDays":14,"monitorSourceIds":["ccipNetworkVolume"],"reviewTrigger":"New monthly publication, missing buckets, negative corrections or a change in provider coverage.","supersededBy":"ccip-volume-20261007"},{"id":"wallet-flow-destinations-20260921","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"The nine selected recipients sent 292146.932580370653103924 LINK outside their group during the covered September 16–21 window. Of this, 92011.331009130655865823 LINK (31.5%, rounded) went to the original funding address from four recipients in eight transfers. Another 28340.54999999999682 LINK went from eight recipients to an address Blockscout had labeled Binance Deposit on September 16. The remainder reached 45 other destinations.","scope":"Recalculation of the published provider-indexed Ethereum LINK ledger, through 2026-09-21T00:39:28.392Z. One-hop positive external transfers from the nine recipients only; distributor returns excluded. Provider label is not verified ownership, sale attribution or total exchange exposure.","sourceIds":["recipient-ledger-20260921","shared-deposit-explorer-label","wallet-sequence-incoming"],"observedAt":"2026-09-21T00:43:27.785Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-21T05:30:48.014134Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"New completed recipient history, revised transfer identities, another matching distribution round, or primary address attribution. Do not sum older return-flow reports with this cohort.","supersededBy":"wallet-flow-destinations-20260925"},{"id":"cre-cleanup-released-v265-20260921","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"Node v2.65.0 was published September 21, 2026 and contains the tracked core workflow cleanup and outgoing connector cleanup merge commits. The release comparison removes legacy web API and compute-action connector methods while retaining workflow_syncer. Pinned workflow files retain the reviewed removal of legacy host options.","scope":"Published source and commit ancestry. No operator deployment, customer migration, performance improvement or fee effect is established.","sourceIds":["node-v265","node-v265-diff","cre-v265-ancestry","connector-v265-ancestry"],"observedAt":"2026-09-21T19:07:39.914Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-21T19:12:53.233034+00:00","recheckAfterDays":7,"monitorSourceIds":["cre","releases"],"reviewTrigger":"A new release, reversal of removed interfaces, or verified deployment evidence."},{"id":"cre-common-merged-outside-v265-20260921","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"Chainlink-common PR 2382 merged September 21 at unchanged reviewed head 22538eb48389bc13b6ce8a3a70ab669e48723041. Node v2.65.0 pins chainlink-common v0.11.2-0.20260914191328-10cc2b41997e, whose commit precedes that merge. The shared-library removal is not included via the pinned dependency.","scope":"Merge status and dependency ancestry; no released dependency upgrade or operator rollout is inferred.","sourceIds":["common-cleanup-pr2382","node-v265-go-mod","common-cleanup-v265-ancestry"],"observedAt":"2026-09-21T19:07:39.914Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-21T19:12:53.233034+00:00","recheckAfterDays":7,"monitorSourceIds":["creDependency","releases"],"reviewTrigger":"A released node pins a dependency containing the merge, a revert, or independently verified operator rollout."},{"id":"cosmos-removal-outside-v265-20260921","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"The Cosmos removal merge fa897c3d55f584de6ece6255c061b8ef6904d0d5 is not an ancestor of node v2.65.0. The reviewed removal remains merged in the repository but outside this release by that ancestry check.","scope":"Exact merge-commit ancestry only; equivalent changes through other commits are not exhaustively excluded. No Cosmos service shutdown or operator deployment is established.","sourceIds":["cosmos-removal-pr","cosmos-v265-ancestry"],"observedAt":"2026-09-21T19:07:39.914Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-21T19:12:53.233034+00:00","recheckAfterDays":7,"monitorSourceIds":["releases"],"reviewTrigger":"A release containing the merge, equivalent changes, a revert, or deployment evidence."},{"id":"reserve-funding-comparison-20260923","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"Across August 24–September 20, 2026, the indexed Payment Abstraction path deposited 377674.3643968987 LINK, versus 506290.644210442 LINK over July 27–August 23: a 25.4% decline. DefiLlama daily USD values sum to $4400472 versus $4534131, a 2.9% decline. Both periods contain four deposits.","scope":"Two adjacent four-complete-week windows in the thirteen-week provider-indexed ledger. Historical USD valuations are not execution prices or all network revenue. Other-sender transfers excluded.","sourceIds":["reserve-funding-ledger-20260923"],"observedAt":"2026-09-23T14:55:41.498Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-23T15:00:00.511Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"New weekly reserve deposits, changed transaction/log evidence, a revised historical USD series or a new comparison period. Review all dependent figures together.","monitorSourceIds":["reserve","reserveHoldings"],"supersededBy":"reserve-funding-comparison-20260928"},{"id":"reserve-payment-route-20260923","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"On September 17, 9984.75 existing LINK moved from the fee aggregator through the auction contract to Payment Abstraction Reserves. Later, a transaction closing a USDC auction swept 87474.509131979227563655 LINK to the same payment contract. A subsequent allocation and withdrawal deposited 97459.259131979 LINK into the strategic reserve. The auction end method sweeps the whole buy-token balance; the payment contract also pools funds.","scope":"Three successful Ethereum transactions with matched raw logs and verified contract source. The earlier sum exceeds the deposit by 0.000000000227563655 LINK. Matching amounts do not establish allocation provenance, service mix, customer identity or that all deposited LINK was newly purchased.","sourceIds":["reserve-funding-ledger-20260923","payment-reserves-verified","payment-auction-verified","reserve-deposit-20260917","payment-existing-link-20260917","payment-auction-end-20260917"],"observedAt":"2026-09-23T14:56:47.734Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-23T15:00:00.511Z","recheckAfterDays":14,"reviewTrigger":"Transaction correction, source-code/configuration change, or primary evidence identifying the original fee source or earmark provenance.","monitorSourceIds":["reserve"]},{"id":"triggerCoordinator-closed-20260925","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"PR 23780 closed without merging on September 25 at 14:30:24 UTC, at the previously inspected head. No closure reason or confirmed replacement appears in the archived PR comments/events.","scope":"GitHub closure status for this proposal; not evidence that the broader coordinator approach was abandoned or released.","sourceIds":["triggerCoordinator-closed-20260925"],"observedAt":"2026-09-25T15:02:52.111Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-25T15:09:59.498Z","recheckAfterDays":3,"reviewTrigger":"Reopening, attributed replacement, containing release or verified deployment evidence.","revision":"0a025aea520a2e12d602f5534df0852f09aa9f82","monitorSourceIds":["triggerCoordinator","releases"]},{"id":"subscriptionCache-gated-write-20260925","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"PR 23774 remains open and unmerged. At revision 1e993f6c10318186802550b22bd6b7962c437a6f, CRE.CachedTriggerSubscriptionsEnabled gates both saving new trigger subscriptions and reusing cached ones. The setting defaults to false; missing or invalid cached data falls back to WASM setup, and cached reuse still checks the subscription-count limit.","scope":"Pinned source and PR status; supersedes the prior statement that cache writing is separate from enabling reuse. No measured startup improvement or operator rollout.","sourceIds":["subscriptionCache-handler-20260925","subscriptionCache-engine-20260925","subscriptionCache-default-20260925"],"observedAt":"2026-09-25T15:02:52.111Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-25T15:09:59.498Z","recheckAfterDays":3,"reviewTrigger":"PR head/status, configuration default, release inclusion or verified rollout changes.","revision":"1e993f6c10318186802550b22bd6b7962c437a6f","monitorSourceIds":["subscriptionCache","releases"],"supersededBy":"subscriptionCache-merged-outside-v267-20261005"},{"id":"reserve-holdings-20260925","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"The September 24 payment-reserve transaction transfers 88105.462965814400000000 LINK to the Chainlink Reserve. The official holdings feed subsequently reports 6047498.39280484 LINK, above six million, versus 5959392.92983903 before the deposit. Current USD valuation remains quote-dependent.","scope":"Exact indexed transfer/log/block identity and official holdings snapshot. Does not identify original customers, service mix, market purchases, profit or historical USD valuation.","sourceIds":["official-reserve-metrics","reserve-deposit-20260924"],"observedAt":"2026-09-25T15:02:52.111Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-25T15:09:59.498Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"monitorSourceIds":["reserveHoldings"],"reviewTrigger":"Changed reserve balances, accounting definition, price reconciliation or historical corrections.","supersededBy":"reserve-holdings-20261008"},{"id":"aave-cre-plasma-reported-20260925","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"LlamaRisk reports deployment of a CRE-backed PT Risk Oracle stack for Aave V3 Plasma. Its September 25 forum update distinguishes the EMA workflow from the discount-rate and eMode agents, which still await governance registration and activation.","scope":"Attributed forum report and contract-address leads; deployments, governance execution, actual workflow cadence and fees are not independently verified.","sourceIds":["aave-cre-plasma-20260925"],"observedAt":"2026-09-25T15:02:52.111Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-25T15:09:59.498Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"Executed governance payload, verified contract permissions and matching CRE reports with downstream parameter updates.","monitorSourceIds":["aaveEconomics"]},{"id":"wallet-flow-destinations-20260925","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"The original nine recipients sent 723930.893324638825971440 LINK outside that fixed group in the September 16–25 covered window. Of this, 207164.067530398835127137 LINK (28.6%, rounded) went to the original funding address from eight recipients in eighteen transfers. Another 48247.34999999999482 LINK went from all nine recipients to an address labeled Binance Deposit by Blockscout on September 16. The remainder reached 77 other destinations.","scope":"Provider-indexed Ethereum LINK ledger through 2026-09-25T15:03:13.842Z. Positive one-hop outflows from the original nine recipients only; internal transfers and the original distributor's own outflows are excluded. The September 25 role change does not redefine the cohort. No inference of sales, beneficial ownership, or original-allocation retention.","sourceIds":["recipient-ledger-20260925","shared-deposit-explorer-label","wallet-sequence-incoming"],"observedAt":"2026-09-25T15:10:45.322Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-25T15:21:34.253Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"New completed recipient history, revised transfer identities, another matching round, or primary address attribution. Preserve the fixed cohort and exact integer denominator.","supersededBy":"wallet-flow-destinations-20260927"},{"id":"wallet-distributor-rotation-20260925","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"On September 25, the original funding address sent 97000 LINK to 0x0f69ba1c26b31a30af681121571d25f8877d6f19, one of the nine earlier recipients. Within 96 seconds that address sent 9700 LINK each to the other eight recipients and the former distributor, 0x020e3cb2db423994eb70156bb87299f68b7ef11f. The nine payments total 87300 LINK, equal to 90% of the funding amount. The same ten payout participants remain, with a changed sender.","scope":"Ten exact successful indexed Ethereum transactions and LINK Transfer logs. This supports a change in the observed sender role; it does not establish ownership, payment purpose, a retained fee, or the provenance of fungible tokens. Eight payments totaling 77600 LINK are internal to the original nine-recipient cohort; the 9700 LINK transfer to the former distributor is external to that fixed cohort.","sourceIds":["wallet-rotation-funding-20260925","wallet-rotation-20260925-0","wallet-rotation-20260925-1","wallet-rotation-20260925-2","wallet-rotation-20260925-3","wallet-rotation-20260925-4","wallet-rotation-20260925-5","wallet-rotation-20260925-6","wallet-rotation-20260925-7","wallet-rotation-20260925-8","recipient-ledger-20260925"],"observedAt":"2026-09-25T15:12:29.336Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-25T15:21:34.253Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"Revised indexed transfers, further changes in the payout participants or primary evidence of wallet identity or payment purpose.","monitorSourceIds":["largeWallet"]},{"id":"wallet-flow-destinations-20260927","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"The original nine recipients sent 857920.353083688820607642 LINK outside that fixed group in the September 16–27 covered window. Of this, 207164.067530398835127137 LINK (24.1%, rounded) went to the original funding address from eight recipients in eighteen transfers. Another 59104.35999999999282 LINK went from all nine recipients in twenty-five transfers to an address labeled Binance Deposit by Blockscout on September 16. The remainder reached 85 other destinations. The funder total is unchanged from the September 25 edition; its share fell because total outflows grew.","scope":"Provider-indexed Ethereum LINK ledger through 2026-09-27T03:04:34.395Z. Collection completed 2026-09-28T00:11:52.219Z after interruptions, retaining its original cutoff. The 1,330-row ledger adds 219 records without changing or removing any record in the September 25 edition. Positive one-hop outflows from the original nine recipients only; internal transfers and the original distributor’s own outflows are excluded. Individual balance observations span September 27–28 and are not used as a common-time balance or allocation-retention measure. No inference of sales, beneficial ownership, or original-allocation retention.","sourceIds":["recipient-ledger-20260927","shared-deposit-explorer-label","wallet-sequence-incoming"],"observedAt":"2026-09-28T00:11:52.219Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-28T00:14:16.599Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"New completed recipient history, revised transfer identities, another matching round, or primary address attribution. Preserve the fixed cohort and exact integer denominator.","supersededBy":"wallet-flow-destinations-20261003"},{"id":"reserve-funding-comparison-20260928","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"Across August 31–September 27, 2026, the indexed Payment Abstraction path deposited 373791.1253525143 LINK, versus 462730.3309609808 LINK over August 3–30: a 19.2% decline. DefiLlama daily USD values sum to $4464892 versus $4482993, a 0.4% decline. Both periods contain four deposits.","scope":"Two adjacent four-complete-week windows in the thirteen-week provider-indexed ledger. Historical USD valuations are not execution prices or all network revenue. Other-sender transfers excluded.","sourceIds":["reserve-funding-ledger-20260928"],"observedAt":"2026-09-28T14:37:02.103Z","reviewedAt":"2026-09-28T14:39:50.390Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"New weekly reserve deposits, changed transaction/log evidence, a revised historical USD series or a new comparison period. Review all dependent figures together.","monitorSourceIds":["reserve","reserveHoldings"],"supersededBy":"reserve-funding-comparison-20261008"},{"kind":"observation","status":"active","reviewedAt":"2026-10-01T14:52:20.889Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"id":"node-v266-operator-changes-20261001","statement":"Node v2.66.0 was published September 28, 2026. Its release commit includes the tracked deprecated Cosmos-support removal and raises the PostgreSQL minimum to 15. The ordinary startup version check rejects PostgreSQL 12–14. The released plugin list omits Cosmos.","scope":"Published source and exact commit ancestry. No operator rollout, service-wide Cosmos shutdown, application migration, usage or revenue effect is established. The database check has an unsupported environment override and skips unreadable or unexpectedly small version values.","sourceIds":["node-release-v266","cosmos-v266-ancestry","postgres-v266-source","plugins-v266-source"],"observedAt":"2026-10-01T14:50:41.384Z","monitorSourceIds":["releases"],"reviewTrigger":"A new release, revert, source correction or independently verified operator deployment."},{"kind":"observation","status":"active","reviewedAt":"2026-10-01T14:52:20.889Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"id":"swift-cre-reported-20261001","statement":"Chainlink announced work to connect financial institutions to Swift’s blockchain ledger using CRE, with institutions retaining their transaction-signing keys. The described ledger coordinates payments before final settlement through agreed mechanisms.","scope":"Chainlink announcement dated September 28, 2026. No attributed production workflows, paying bank count, fees or reserve contribution verified.","sourceIds":["swift-cre-announcement-20260928"],"observedAt":"2026-10-01T14:50:41.508Z","monitorSourceIds":["announcements"],"reviewTrigger":"Named production participants, attributable workflows, confirmed service payments or a revised announcement."},{"kind":"observation","status":"active","reviewedAt":"2026-10-01T14:52:20.889Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"id":"aave-base-equities-reported-20261001","statement":"Aave Labs’ September development update reports activation of Aave V4 on Base with seven Coinbase tokenized equities as collateral and USDC as the sole borrowable asset in its Equities Hub.","scope":"First-party progress report posted October 1. Contract addresses, balances, oracle reads and payments were not independently verified in this review. This report cannot quantify Chainlink adoption or fees.","sourceIds":["aave-labs-september-2026"],"observedAt":"2026-10-01T14:49:40.300Z","monitorSourceIds":["aaveEconomics"],"reviewTrigger":"Verified deployment addresses and attributable borrowing, oracle-consumption or fee records."},{"id":"cre-common-released-v266-20261001","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"Node v2.66.0 pins chainlink-common commit 538f4bf0cb6f9b6109493b26601c007bdd5c00b6, the merge of PR #2382 removing legacy DAG host paths. The previously reviewed v2.65.0 pinned an earlier library revision; this shared-library removal is included in v2.66.0.","scope":"Exact released dependency and resolved commit identity. This verifies source inclusion, not operator rollout, application migration, throughput or fee income. The v2.65.0 observation remains a dated historical comparison.","sourceIds":["node-release-v266","node-v266-common-pin","common-cleanup-pr2382"],"observedAt":"2026-10-01T15:07:41.606212+00:00","reviewedAt":"2026-10-01T15:08:29.807764+00:00","recheckAfterDays":7,"monitorSourceIds":["releases","creDependency"],"reviewTrigger":"A changed dependency pin, revert, corrected release or independently verified operator deployment."},{"id":"ethereum-payment-event-mechanics-20261003","kind":"fact","status":"active","statement":"The reviewed Ethereum CCIP 2.0 OnRamp emits itemized fee-token receipts; its final receipt is the network fee and identifies the calling router. The reviewed 1.6 OnRamp emits the total fee token amount without that component split. The reviewed VRF v2.5 coordinator emits the payment charged at fulfillment, including a native-payment flag and callback success. Subscription funding is a separate event.","scope":"Verified ABI and deployed implementation for two named CCIP OnRamps and one VRF v2.5 coordinator. This is an accounting definition, not a completed seven-day measurement, all-network revenue or confirmed LINK purchases. Initial public historical collection remains incomplete because of provider access/rate limits.","sourceIds":["payments-contracts-20261003","ccip-current-ethereum-directory","vrf-v25-billing"],"observedAt":"2026-10-03T03:08:42.017758Z","reviewedAt":"2026-10-03T03:22:15.560428Z","recheckAfterDays":30,"reviewTrigger":"Deployment bytecode, router, event layout, fee tokens or official contract registry changes. Review a complete collection before publishing any payment totals."},{"id":"wallet-flow-destinations-20261003","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"The original nine recipients sent 1445003.837034656285393043 LINK outside that fixed group in the September 16–October 1 covered window. Of this, 358050.131300352806022033 LINK (24.8%, rounded) went to the original funding address from all nine recipients in thirty-two transfers. Another 79687.07999999998882 LINK went from all nine recipients in thirty transfers to an address labeled Binance Deposit by Blockscout on September 16. The remaining 1007266.625734303490551010 LINK reached 105 other destinations. All nine recipients now appear in the return-flow ledger, up from eight in the September 27 coverage.","scope":"Provider-indexed Ethereum LINK ledger through 2026-10-01T14:48:08.196Z. Collection completed 2026-10-03T02:29:45.017Z after interruptions, retaining its original cutoff. The 1,917-row ledger adds 587 records without changing or removing any record in the preceding 1,330-row edition. Positive one-hop outflows from the original nine recipients only; internal transfers and the original distributor’s own outflows are excluded. All rows match archived responses; each recipient pagination chain crosses the case start or exhausts results. Individual balance observations span October 1–3 and are not used as a common-time balance or allocation-retention measure. No inference of sales, beneficial ownership, or original-allocation retention.","sourceIds":["recipient-ledger-20261003","shared-deposit-explorer-label","wallet-sequence-incoming"],"observedAt":"2026-10-03T02:29:45.017Z","reviewedAt":"2026-10-03T06:32:58.039Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"New completed recipient history, revised transfer identities, another matching round, or primary address attribution. Preserve the fixed cohort and exact integer denominator.","supersededBy":"wallet-flow-destinations-20261007"},{"id":"node-v267-operator-changes-20261005","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"Node v2.67.0 was published October 5, 2026. Its pinned EVM library can monitor an ERC-20 fee-token balance instead of a native-token balance when configured. The node image adds PostgreSQL client 18; the ordinary server minimum remains 15, already present in v2.66.0. Its bridge observation-cache lifetime rises from 60 to 90 seconds.","scope":"Published release, pinned dependencies and inspected source. Gas balances are operator infrastructure balances, not Chainlink customer receipts. The observation cache is node-side and is not a network-wide oracle freshness limit. No operator rollout, measured performance or fee effect is established.","sourceIds":["node-release-v267","node-v267-postgres-source","node-v267-docker-source","node-v267-balance-source","node-v267-balance-implementation","node-v267-dependencies","node-v267-bridge-cache"],"observedAt":"2026-10-05T19:39:21.658Z","reviewedAt":"2026-10-05T19:44:29.132815+00:00","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"A new release, revert, corrected source or verified operator deployment.","monitorSourceIds":["releases"],"revision":"df15279b3ab71f1e86f5deed72647949e69d3d7f"},{"id":"subscriptionCache-merged-outside-v267-20261005","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"PR #23774 merged October 5 at e4a454a601bf6c6abbcc17bbc2c7079650534500. Cached trigger-subscription writes and reuse remain disabled by default; invalid or missing cached data falls back to workflow setup. Cached reuse checks the subscription-count limit, and new writes are asynchronous with a ten-second timeout. The same merge classifies zero subscriptions from WASM as a permanent initialization error outside the cache gate. The merge is outside v2.67.0; the released configuration and engine lack the setting and reuse path.","scope":"Merged source and release ancestry with direct release-code checks. No startup benchmark, enabled deployment, customer adoption or fee effect is verified.","sourceIds":["subscriptionCache-merge-20261005","subscriptionCache-engine-20261005","subscriptionCache-handler-20261005","subscriptionCache-default-20261005","subscriptionCache-v267-ancestry"],"observedAt":"2026-10-05T19:39:21.658Z","reviewedAt":"2026-10-05T19:44:29.132815+00:00","recheckAfterDays":3,"reviewTrigger":"A containing release, revert, default change, operator enablement or measured startup performance.","monitorSourceIds":["subscriptionCache","releases"],"revision":"e4a454a601bf6c6abbcc17bbc2c7079650534500"},{"id":"ccip-volume-20261007","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"The official CCIP series reports $25.4752B cumulative token-transfer volume through September 2026. Consecutive month-end differences in the October 6 publication imply $1.3578B transferred in September versus $1.2135B in August, an 11.9% increase. This feed supplies no daily CCIP fees or fee split.","scope":"Chainlink provider-filtered token-transfer volume, July 2023 through September 2026. All 39 cumulative month-end observations are consecutive; the first has no preceding month for a monthly difference. Earlier values differ from the preceding collection only by sub-cent numeric revisions. Not unique capital, customer counts or fees. Raw source and calculation retained in data/evidence/core/2026-10-07.","sourceIds":["official-ccip-volume","official-ccip-volume-20261007"],"observedAt":"2026-10-07T00:48:42.133Z","reviewedAt":"2026-10-07T13:55:53.343415+00:00","recheckAfterDays":14,"monitorSourceIds":["ccipNetworkVolume"],"reviewTrigger":"New monthly publication, missing buckets, negative corrections or a change in provider coverage."},{"id":"wallet-flow-destinations-20261007","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"The original nine recipients sent 1684464.946711540022264961 LINK outside that fixed group in the September 16–October 5 covered window. Of this, 517155.622650727049660153 LINK (30.7%, rounded) went to the original funding address from all nine recipients in 46 transfers. Another 79687.079999999988820000 LINK went from all nine recipients in 30 transfers to an address labeled Binance Deposit by Blockscout on September 16. The remaining 1087622.244060812983784808 LINK reached 112 other destinations.","scope":"Original nine-recipient cohort; Ethereum LINK only; one-hop indexed transfers through original scan cutoff. Balances have different observation times. No purpose, sale, beneficial-owner or original-allocation retention inference. All 2,233 rows match archived responses, with 316 added and no changed or removed rows from the previous edition. The scan completed October 7 after interruptions; wallet balance observations span October 5–7 and do not share a block or common observation time.","sourceIds":["recipient-ledger-20261007","shared-deposit-explorer-label","wallet-sequence-incoming"],"observedAt":"2026-10-07T14:16:39.439Z","reviewedAt":"2026-10-07T14:21:56.716012+00:00","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"New completed recipient history, revised transfer identities, another matching round, or primary address attribution. Preserve the fixed cohort and exact integer denominator.","supersededBy":"wallet-flow-destinations-20261009"},{"id":"reserve-funding-comparison-20261008","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"Across September 7–October 4, 2026, the indexed Payment Abstraction path deposited 351383.3962394993 LINK versus 419885.0242994616 LINK across August 10–September 6, down 16.3%. DefiLlama daily USD valuations total $4394742 versus $4468168, down 1.6%. Both periods contain four deposits.","scope":"Two adjacent four-complete-week windows within the thirteen-week ledger. The new October 8 deposit falls outside this completed-week study. Historical USD values are not execution prices or all-network revenue; other-sender receipts are excluded. The earlier September 17 transaction trace and its review date are preserved.","sourceIds":["reserve-funding-ledger-20261008"],"observedAt":"2026-10-08T18:29:35.879499Z","reviewedAt":"2026-10-08T18:32:57.318420+00:00","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"New comparison period, changed transaction/log evidence or revised historical dollar valuations. Review all dependent figures together.","monitorSourceIds":["reserve","reserveHoldings"]},{"id":"reserve-holdings-20261008","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"The October 8 payment-reserve transaction adds 82480.358896991200000000 LINK. Official holdings subsequently report 6204681.79100947 LINK, versus 6122201.43211248 before the deposit. The sampled indexed holder balance increases by the exact transfer amount.","scope":"Successful indexed transaction and matching transaction/log/block identities, holder-balance change and official holdings. The indexed absolute balance is about 0.0016 LINK above the official total; source totals are retained separately. USD value depends on the source quote. No service mix, customer, profit or new-market-purchase attribution.","sourceIds":["official-reserve-metrics","reserve-deposit-20261008"],"observedAt":"2026-10-08T18:28:21.496Z","reviewedAt":"2026-10-08T18:32:57.318420+00:00","recheckAfterDays":7,"monitorSourceIds":["reserve","reserveHoldings"],"reviewTrigger":"Changed balances, transaction revision, source accounting definition or funding provenance evidence."},{"id":"wallet-flow-destinations-20261009","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"The original nine recipients sent 1836211.634719520865199910 LINK outside that fixed group in the September 16–October 8 covered window. Of this, 583223.849306325892478567 LINK (31.8%, rounded) went to the original funding address from all nine recipients in 52 transfers. Another 79687.079999999988820000 LINK went from all nine recipients in 30 transfers to an address labeled Binance Deposit by Blockscout on September 16; that cumulative amount is unchanged from the previous edition. The remaining 1173300.705413194983901343 LINK reached 119 other destinations.","scope":"Original nine-recipient cohort; Ethereum LINK only; one-hop indexed transfers through original scan cutoff. Balances have different observation times. No purpose, sale, beneficial-owner or original-allocation retention inference. All 2,417 rows match archived responses, with 184 added and no changed or removed rows from the prior edition. Collection completed October 9; individual balance observations span October 8–9 and do not share a block or common observation time.","sourceIds":["recipient-ledger-20261009","shared-deposit-explorer-label","wallet-sequence-incoming"],"observedAt":"2026-10-09T02:34:55.921Z","reviewedAt":"2026-10-09T02:36:06.326099+00:00","recheckAfterDays":7,"reviewTrigger":"New completed recipient history, revised transfer identities, another matching round, or primary address attribution. Preserve the fixed cohort and exact integer denominator."},{"id":"ccip-gho-repeat-20261010","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"From July 12 through October 9, 2026, the CCIP API returned 842 outbound Ethereum GHO messages, all reported delivered at review. Two documented launch messages moved 100M of 179.246M GHO; the other 840 moved 79.246M. In the latest 30 days, non-launch message count increased from 272 to 330 while GHO volume declined from 28.770M to 24.227M; mean amount per message fell from about 105.8K to 73.4K GHO. Of the 128 origin addresses in the first 30 days, 34 appeared in the next period and 21 in the final period. A fee detail was collected for 70 selected messages: 2 LINK, 31 GHO and 37 WETH.","scope":"Provider-paginated outbound Ethereum GHO token messages only. 564 of 564 messages in the overlapping period through September 16 match the existing Blockscout pool ledger by transaction, sender and exact amount; later dates are not cross-checked against that ledger. Address repeat use is not customer retention. The 70 fee details are selected examples, not a random sample or complete fee series. No net LINK income is calculated.","sourceIds":["ccip-gho-window-20261010","ccip-api-message-search","gho-launch-arbitrum-proposal","gho-launch-monad-proposal","ccip-billing-mechanics"],"observedAt":"2026-10-10T18:36:23.075Z","reviewedAt":"2026-10-10T18:48:05.862Z","recheckAfterDays":7,"monitorSourceIds":["gho"],"reviewTrigger":"Window changes, missing or revised message records, launch classification changes, provider coverage, pool-ledger reconciliation, fee corrections or material changes in the routed volume comparison."},{"id":"ccip-gho-inbound-20261010","kind":"observation","status":"superseded","statement":"Two CCIP messages delivered 3.000M and 3.0019M GHO from Plasma to the same Ethereum address on October 8 and October 10, 2026, each in five seconds. Both receipts match the corresponding GHO-pool transfer records. The API reports WXPL source charges of 83.8627 and 19.5893 WXPL, respectively, with network and executor components.","scope":"Two transaction-level examples found in the bounded Ethereum GHO-pool transfer sample, separate from the outbound Ethereum GHO dataset. The recipient is unlabelled. Two samples do not establish an inbound flow trend. Charges are not net LINK revenue.","sourceIds":["ccip-gho-inbound-example-20261010","ccip-gho-inbound-message-20261010","ccip-gho-inbound-receipt-20261010","ccip-gho-inbound-wxpl-20261010","ccip-billing-mechanics","ccip-gho-window-20261010"],"observedAt":"2026-10-10T18:36:23.075Z","reviewedAt":"2026-10-10T18:51:27.666Z","recheckAfterDays":30,"reviewTrigger":"CCIP message correction, receipt reorganization, fee-token misattribution or a broader verified inbound dataset.","supersededBy":"ccip-gho-inbound-20261011"},{"id":"ccip-gho-inbound-20261011","kind":"observation","status":"active","statement":"From October 8 through October 11, 2026, five verified CCIP messages delivered 6,130,201.780094561495531258 GHO from Plasma (four messages) and Ink (one) to Ethereum. One address received 6,001,858.917953075 GHO across two Plasma messages, 97.9% of these five examples; each took five seconds. Three other messages reached distinct addresses: 100,090 GHO from Ink in 22 minutes 38 seconds, and 23,702.862 GHO and 4,550 GHO from Plasma in 11 and 16 seconds. All five CCIP records report SUCCESS and match an Ethereum OffRamp execution, GHO-pool release and transfer log by receipt transaction, recipient and amount.","scope":"Five transaction-level examples discovered in a bounded Ethereum GHO-pool transfer sample, separate from the outbound Ethereum GHO dataset. Four recipient addresses are unlabelled. The sample is not a complete inbound time series, route-wide volume count or latency distribution. Four gross source fees are WXPL and one is WETH; they are not net LINK revenue or typical fee estimates. CCIP status and indexed logs were not independently replayed.","sourceIds":["ccip-gho-inbound-example-20261011","ccip-gho-inbound-message-ink-20261011","ccip-gho-inbound-message-plasma-a-20261011","ccip-gho-inbound-message-plasma-b-20261011","ccip-gho-inbound-receipt-ink-20261011","ccip-gho-inbound-receipt-plasma-a-20261011","ccip-gho-inbound-receipt-plasma-b-20261011","ink-weth-token","ccip-billing-mechanics","ccip-gho-inbound-example-20261010"],"observedAt":"2026-10-11T13:20:00.000Z","reviewedAt":"2026-10-11T13:25:48.000Z","recheckAfterDays":30,"monitorSourceIds":["gho"],"reviewTrigger":"Message status or receipt log changes, additional matched inbound messages, fee/token corrections or a more complete route dataset."}],"metrics":[{"id":"wallet-change","question":"Where has observed LINK custody shifted?","population":"Fixed first-observation top-50 Ethereum address cohort","unit":"LINK; integer raw amounts at 18 decimals","mechanics":"First-to-latest balance difference. Redistribution does not require issuance. Net zero can conceal intermediate transfers.","coverage":"Point-in-time top-holder pages; missing address is unknown, not zero; no block pin.","display":"Rank comparable nonzero changes; state time window, cohort, unchanged and missing counts. Suppress flat line charts.","neverInfer":["buying or selling","one address equals one owner","global wallet flow"],"claimIds":["link-distribution"]},{"id":"gho-pool-flow","question":"How does activity through the attributed Ethereum pool vary over time?","population":"Indexed GHO Transfer events involving the tracked pool","unit":"GHO per complete UTC day","mechanics":"Incoming and outgoing token transfers may reflect bridging, liquidity or operations. Self-transfers appear on both sides.","coverage":"Completed 90-day pagination; omit partial days. Explorer history, not independent finality.","display":"Paired daily bars with visible dates, zero baseline and exact table; incomplete scan is not zero activity.","neverInfer":["completed cross-chain message count","distinct paying applications","Chainlink revenue"],"claimIds":["gho-source-call"]},{"id":"reserve-additions","question":"Is the rate of reserve accumulation changing?","population":"Verified reserve deposits from the attributed payment path","unit":"LINK per deposit or complete week","mechanics":"Periodic funding batches separate payment time, conversion time and deposit time. Weekly cadence is an observation to verify, not a protocol guarantee.","coverage":"Require attributed deposit transactions and explicit period coverage.","display":"Deposit-event or complete-week bars; label incomplete weeks. Do not add aggregator receipts to the same downstream deposits.","neverInfer":["all network revenue","profit","five busy days means concentrated customers"],"claimIds":["reserve-path","reserve-funding-comparison-20260928","reserve-payment-route-20260923"]},{"id":"development","question":"Which technical changes have progressed toward production?","population":"Explicitly reviewed repository, PR, commit and dependency","unit":"Evidence milestones, not commit-count score","mechanics":"Open PR → merged code → containing release → verified deployment are distinct evidence stages.","coverage":"Core-node sample; other repositories and private work excluded.","display":"Name source and observation date; concise product context; unknown release/deployment states remain unknown.","neverInfer":["adoption from merge","fees from commit count","performance gain without measurement"],"claimIds":["cre-role","cre-host-cleanup-merged","automation-removal-v264"]},{"id":"gho-launch-adjustment","question":"How much of observed GHO pool inflow came from documented protocol launch funding?","population":"All recorded incoming transfers to the attributed Ethereum pool during complete covered UTC days; exactly two classified transaction/log pairs.","unit":"GHO raw 18-decimal integers; per-message LINK fee raw integers.","mechanics":"Join governance execution to mint, bridge funding, pool lock, CCIP message and matching fee-token transfer; classify only those matching transfers.","coverage":"Existing completed pool ledger plus two reviewed Blockscout receipts, verified payload identities, pinned governance proposals and CCIP API message records.","display":"Show classified versus remaining inflows, common dates, optional launch exclusion with rescaling disclosed, and trace links. Missing or revised matched logs fail closed.","neverInfer":["other inflows are organic","two messages establish typical fees","token volume is revenue","CCIP receipt proves subsequent GSM usage"],"claimIds":["gho-launch-window-2026-09-16"]},{"id":"recipient-followup-flows","question":"Do the nine recipient wallets send LINK to shared destinations over time?","population":"The nine fixed recipient addresses of the September 16 10,000 LINK transfers; Ethereum LINK only.","unit":"Raw LINK integers; distinct source addresses; cumulative observed transfers.","mechanics":"Deduplicate by transaction/log identity, reconcile complete provider scans since the case, exclude original seed receipts from additional inflows and internal cohort movement from external outflows. Group external destinations by exact address.","coverage":"Bounded resumable Blockscout scans. Published data requires all nine seeds and complete address windows. Balances are individually timed provider observations; one-hop destinations only.","display":"Destination bars only when positive external flows exist. Dates and unknown identity visible. 1/7/30-day checkpoints use first complete scan started after due time and show delays. No retention chart from account balances.","neverInfer":["transfer is sale","same destination proves common owner","current balance is retained seed funding","no missing rows because the provider returned a page","checkpoint balance is block-pinned"],"claimIds":["wallet-nine-transfers"]},{"id":"repeat-distribution","question":"Does the same distributor repeatedly pay the same exact recipient set, and how do the transfer amounts change?","population":"The September 16 and September 20 funding transactions and their nine subsequent Ethereum LINK transfers; exactly matched full recipient addresses.","unit":"LINK raw 18-decimal integers per funding transaction and per group of nine outgoing transfers; seconds to the final outgoing transfer.","mechanics":"Compare two temporal sequences without tracing fungible token provenance. Zero-value and lookalike-address events are excluded. A 90% amount ratio does not establish a retained 10% balance or commission.","coverage":"Previously reviewed September 16 transfer evidence plus successful transaction calls and matching indexed Transfer logs for the September 20 round; two bounded event windows, not a complete lifetime distribution history.","display":"Paired funding/outgoing bars on a shared zero-based LINK scale, with date, recipient count and per-recipient amount; transaction details in disclosure.","neverInfer":["common beneficial owner","salary, rewards or commission","original tokens returned or retained","all distribution rounds have been observed"],"claimIds":["wallet-nine-transfers","wallet-repeat-distribution-20260921"]},{"id":"svr-economic-exposure","question":"Which collateral and liquidation days drive SVR proceeds, and what is exposed to a proposed protocol-fee change?","population":"LlamaRisk published Aave V3 market-day asset records; market selector preserves a fixed market rather than mixing histories with different end dates.","unit":"USD of gross shared proceeds; percentage of recorded proceeds in the same market and returned window.","mechanics":"Sum per-day per-asset recaptured USD; rank collateral. WBTC/WETH/wstETH define the proposal cohort in Ethereum Core only. Day dots preserve temporal gaps. Denominators use matching rows; do not average daily percentages.","coverage":"Snapshot with incomplete indexing coverage. Current UTC fetch day excluded. Empty market is unknown. Financial summary and daily histories remain separate and their discrepancy disclosed.","display":"Historical date range beside chart, zero-based asset bars, dated daily dots and exact table; reported cumulative allocation stays distinct from daily data and dashboard range controls.","neverInfer":["Chainlink net income from gross recapture","cash settlement from modeled allocation","market inactivity from absent rows","fee proposal enacted from closed discussion","revenue loss from exposed share","annualized recurring revenue from liquidation bursts","LINK buying or reserve receipt"],"claimIds":["svr-reported-allocation-20260921","svr-provider-coverage-20260921","svr-lpf-exposure-20260921"]},{"id":"ccip-gho-origin-repeat","question":"How much GHO bridging is documented launch funding, and do the same origin addresses use this outbound route again?","population":"CCIP API messages carrying the attributed Ethereum GHO token from Ethereum across three complete consecutive 30-day UTC periods. Repeat-use population excludes only two exact reviewed launch messages.","unit":"Messages, exact GHO raw integers, distinct origin addresses and fixed starting-cohort percentages. Per-message fee amount in its own token.","mechanics":"Follow cursor pagination strictly before the lower time boundary, deduplicate message IDs, join launch classification by ID, transaction and amount. Group by origin rather than shared sender contracts; compare each later period independently against the same first-period group. Fees join to exact source identity and amount.","coverage":"90 complete UTC days; provider-indexed history, not independently replayed logs. 564 of 564 messages in the overlap through September 16 match the existing GHO pool ledger. Fees cover 70 selected messages of 842; no representative fee estimate or complete fee series. Current day excluded.","display":"Compare documented launch share of volume and messages; chart daily outbound route activity; compare consecutive 30-day non-launch message counts and GHO amounts; fixed-denominator 30-day address cohort; selected fee examples; downloadable message provenance and inline limitations.","neverInfer":["Origin addresses are unique customers or applications","Disappearance from one route means churn","First observed in this window means new customer","Non-launch traffic is organic","Token volume or total message fee equals net revenue","A few fees represent typical or complete fees"],"claimIds":["ccip-gho-repeat-20261010"]},{"id":"reserve-total-holdings","question":"How much LINK does the reserve currently hold, and what is it worth at the latest quoted price?","population":"Official Chainlink Reserve address, total LINK holdings","unit":"LINK and spot USD","mechanics":"Current LINK balance times source LINK/USD quote; daily closing LINK balance chart. Provider decimal precision, not raw token integers.","coverage":"Official aggregate and daily history. No independent chain replay; third-party transfers can enter the balance. Timezone-less timestamps interpreted as UTC.","display":"Headline both LINK and USD with source quote and date. Plot complete-day LINK balances; preserve gaps, never chart repriced historical USD as dated valuations.","neverInfer":["fee revenue","verified purchases","cash invested at current valuation","balance equals all-time funding along one path"],"claimIds":["reserve-holdings-20260921"]},{"id":"ccip-monthly-volume","question":"Is the value transferred through CCIP growing month to month?","population":"Chainlink official CCIP token-transfer volume across its covered networks","unit":"USD transferred per complete calendar month","mechanics":"Difference between consecutive cumulative month-end totals. Exclude incomplete months; missing predecessors and negative revisions produce null.","coverage":"Official monthly aggregate with provider filtering. No fee or message-count series. Repeated transfers can reuse capital.","display":"Monthly bars and latest monthly volume/change, alongside cumulative total. Label dates and volume; show daily fee coverage as unavailable.","neverInfer":["daily CCIP fees","unique bridged capital","customer revenue","LINK purchases","total verified oracle messages are CCIP messages"],"claimIds":["ccip-volume-20261007"]},{"id":"wallet-case-destination-share","question":"Where did the nine selected recipients send LINK after the first observed distribution?","population":"Exactly the nine recipients in the two reviewed September 16 and September 20 distribution sequences","unit":"LINK raw integer amounts and share of positive external recipient outflows","mechanics":"Recalculate from unique transaction/log records within one window; split mutually exclusive destinations into the original funding address, one explicitly provider-labeled deposit address, and all other destinations. Exclude internal transfers and the distributor’s own payments.","coverage":"Published complete provider-indexed recipient scan, through its stated cutoff. One hop only. Historical Blockscout deposit label is unverified; other destinations may also be exchanges. Prior holdings and other receipts prevent allocation-retention inference.","display":"One case with a switchable route diagram and three destination-share bars on a common 0–100% scale. Exact transactions open on selection. Keep the cohort/date visible; collapse raw balances and incomplete checkpoints into source evidence.","neverInfer":["market-wide whale behavior","common owner","original allocation returned","transfers are sales","unlabeled destinations are not exchanges","90% transfer ratio establishes a retained commission"],"claimIds":["wallet-flow-destinations-20260921","wallet-repeat-distribution-20260921"]},{"id":"ethereum-service-payments","question":"How much was charged for CCIP sends and VRF fulfillments, and what portion is an itemized CCIP network fee?","population":"Events from the exact two reviewed Ethereum CCIP OnRamps and one VRF v2.5 coordinator during seven complete UTC days.","unit":"Raw 18-decimal integers grouped separately by service and payment token; event counts.","mechanics":"CCIP 2.0 receipts are summed once, with the final receipt also shown as a component. CCIP 1.6 remains an unsplit gross charge. VRF uses the fulfillment payment and retains charged callback failures; subscription top-ups and downstream transfers are excluded.","coverage":"Requires a completed bounded range scan, deployment bytecode checks and an explicit reviewed timestamp. Explorer coverage is not independent chain completeness. Missing block hashes remain null; retain raw responses and transaction/log identities.","display":"No public panel until seven complete days have been reviewed. Daily bars with currency controls, explicit Ethereum/deployment coverage, a separate 2.0-only network-fee series, dates, and downloadable evidence. Keep missing breakdowns distinct from zero.","neverInfer":["all Chainlink revenue","network fees are profit","subscription funding equals consumed fees","gross charges equal LINK purchases","seven-day pilot measures long-term growth"],"claimIds":["ethereum-payment-event-mechanics-20261003"]}],"questions":[{"id":"svr-fee-capture","question":"Does the Aave liquidation-fee proposal change SVR proceeds per dollar of liquidation opportunity, after controlling for collateral and market conditions?","needed":["Verified governance execution and block-specific fee configuration","Complete matched liquidation, bonus, SVR bid and builder allocation records","Common market and collateral cohorts before and after the change","Separate conversion and reserve settlement evidence"],"blockedBy":"Implementation is unverified; public daily histories have different end dates and do not reconcile fully with the provider summary."},{"id":"ccip-retention","question":"Do the same attributed applications keep using CCIP?","needed":["Source and destination message IDs and status","Versioned application-to-contract evidence","Complete observation windows","Service fees separated from execution gas and refunds","Recurring fee-payer cohorts with governance launch funding and internal treasury movements labeled","Fees by attributed application, including concentration and observation-window completeness"],"blockedBy":"A complete 90-day Ethereum GHO message window now supports origin-address repeat-use analysis. Application/entity ownership, full cross-chain coverage, per-message fee completeness and service-fee separation remain unverified."},{"id":"custody-paths","question":"Are distributions reaching exchange custody, staking or bridges?","needed":["Versioned verified entity/address labels","Transfer paths and internal-transfer exclusions","Reconciled block coverage"],"blockedBy":"Explorer names alone cannot identify beneficial owners or sales."},{"id":"cre-release-path","question":"When does a reviewed CRE change reach a deployed service?","needed":["Merged commit and dependency pin","Containing release","Public deployment evidence"],"blockedBy":"PR activity and published version numbers alone do not establish deployment."},{"id":"automation-cre-retention","question":"How many former Automation applications migrated to CRE and retained paid execution?","needed":["Attributed pre-sunset Automation application cohort","Verified successor CRE workflows","Comparable execution and payment coverage"],"blockedBy":"Sunset notices and node code removal do not measure migration completion or retained demand."},{"id":"gho-post-launch-utilization","question":"How much of the bridged launch allocation reached the destination GhoReserve and was subsequently used for GSM swaps?","needed":["Destination receipt and Collector-to-GhoReserve transfers","Attributed reserve and GSM contracts","Completed swap-event history and inventory observations"],"blockedBy":"This investigation verifies the launch purpose and CCIP-reported receipt; subsequent funding and swap utilization are not yet joined."},{"id":"aave-cre-plasma-activation","question":"Do CRE reports reach the Plasma PT oracle, and when do approved discount-rate and eMode changes begin executing?","needed":["Verified deployed code and Router/forwarder permissions","Executed AIP and AgentHub registrations","Matched report events and downstream parameter writes with timestamps","Fee or billing evidence separate from configured workflow cadence"],"blockedBy":"The September 25 forum report says the agent-bearing routes await governance activation. Contract addresses and claimed cadence are leads, not execution evidence."}]}